Not a Fund. That’s the Point.

This is not a fund — and it ought not be.

I can hear it now… when people first hear about this, their first question may be:

“So… is this a fund?”

It’s a fair question. Because most real estate investing options are funds (think REITs and PE firms)… But I would propose that it ought not be considered one, and here’s why that matters.

What a fund does:

A fund asks you to:

  • Commit your capital up front

  • Rely on someone else’s judgment

  • Hope they do what they said they will

  • Accept terms (fees, structure, timeline) you didn’t negotiate

A good fund can work well. But it requires a lot of trust, very early on, with very little control.

That hasn't satisfied me, and I hope that's not the kind of thing that attracts people to this.

What we do instead:

I propose we build something closer to a member-led angel group.

That means:

  • No blind pool — you only back investment strategies / vehicles you believe in

  • No fixed investment period — come in when it makes sense for you

  • No sponsor — decisions come from within the group, not from above it

We choose collaboration over delegation. We choose transparency over convenience. We choose ownership over optics.

What this enables:

By not being a fund, we get to:

  • Share the overhead of legal, accounting, etc.

  • Move fast, without being locked into a strategy memo from 2 years ago

  • Say no to deals without worrying about “dry powder”

  • Say yes to deals that fit a box as well as fit our values (if you so choose)

  • Welcome members who contribute sweat equity, in addition to checks

I'm not saying it's necessarily easier, but I am proposing that it's better. Because for people like me who want to help shape what this becomes, that tradeoff is the feature.

Previous
Previous

Builders that Belong Here

Next
Next

What “Member-Led” Actually Means